WATER DOWSING IN ARID REGIONS:
REPORT ON A TEN YEAR GERMAN GOVERNMENT PROJECT
(1)
From the Journal of Scientific Exploration
Stanford University Stanford, Ca.
Stanford, Ca. USA , March 27, 1995
In an article published in the current
issue of
the peer-reviewed Journal of Scientific Exploration, a science journal
with the editorial offices at Stanford University, Professor
Hans-Dieter
Betz, a physicist at the University of Munich, presents the
results of a German government sponsored program to test and apply
dowsing
methods to locate water sources in arid regions. This ten year
project
involved over 2000 drillings in Sri Lanka, Zaire, Kenya, Namibia,
Yemen
and other countries and is thus the most ambitious experiment with
water
dowsing ever carried out.
While an adequate water supply is not a
major problem
in most industrialized nations, it is estimated that water pollution is
responsible for some 80% of all diseases in Third World countries. Lack
of high quality drinking water affects approximately two billion people
on a worldwide scale and is a problem that is growing, according to the
United Nations.
The enormity of this problem led the German
government
to initiate a long range program via the GTZ(Deutsche Gesellschaft fur
Technische Zussammenarbeit or German Association for Technical
Cooperation)
to explore innovative water detection methods in arid regions. Motivated
by both the high cost and modest success rate of purely conventional
hydrogeological
methods, the GTZ project teamed geological experts, experienced
dowsers
and a scientific group led by Professor Betz to monitor and evaluate
the
results.
The outcome was striking. An
overall
success rate of 96% (by dowsers) was achieved in 691 drillings
in
Sri Lanka. Based on geological experience in that area, a success
rate of 30-50% would be expected from conventional techniques alone.
But the overall success rate is not the
only indication
that the dowsing phenomenon is of considerable practical use. According
to Betz, what is both puzzling but enormously useful, is that in
hundreds
of cases the dowsers were able to predict the depth of the water
source
and the yield of the well to within 10 to 20 percent. We
carefully
considered the statistics of these correlations, and they far
exceeded lucky guesses.
Numerous conventional explanations for the
success
of dowsing-located drill sites were carefully examined by Betz in a
series
of reports summarized in the article. Virtually all of the
drill
sites were in regions where the odds of finding water by random
drilling
were extremely low, thus eliminating the success by chance hypothesis.
Another argument sometimes advanced is that
dowsers
get subtle clues from the landscape and geology, perhaps without even
being
consciously aware of their highly developed detective skills. This too
was ruled out in various ways, the most impressive being the ability of
dowsers to locate underground sources, often 100 feet down, whose
streams
are so narrow that misplacing the drill site by a few feet would yield
a dry hole. Such precision is far beyond any know geological indicators.
The scientists also carried out laboratory
tests,
placing water pipes underground or in a test room one story below where
dowsing subjects were asked to walk around and find the artificial
sources
of flowing water. Such idealized tests were not successful enough to
account
for the real-life drilling results. This led Betz to hypothesize that
it
is not some unknown biological sensitivity to water that underlies the
phenomenon.
Betz conjectures that there may be subtle
electromagnetic
gradients resulting from the fissures and water flows creating changes
in the electrical properties of rock and soil. The dowsers somehow
sense
these gradients in a hypersensitive state.
Says Betz: I’m a scientist, and those are
my best
plausible scientific hypotheses at this point. But there are two things
that I am certain of after ten years of field research. A combination
of
dowsing and modern hydrogeophysical techniques can be both more
successful
and far less expensive than we had thought. And we need to run a lot
more
tests, because we have established that dowsing works, but have
no idea how or why.
1.
The American Dowser, Fall
1995, Volume
35, No. 4 The American Society of Dowsers
This work was published in The Journal of
Scientific
Exploration, / Stanford University -
Unconventional Water Detection, by Hans-Dieter Betz, 1995.
Return
to Dowsing FAQ Page
To
American Society of Dowsers Home Page
Copyright 1996 - American Society of
Dowsers, Inc.
This page prepared and maintained for The
American Society
of Dowsers, Inc. by Groundwater.Com
Comments to: Kenneth E. Bannister
|