BELL'S THEOREM PROVES PHYSICAL REALITY MUST
Physics concerns itself only with outer experiences not inner and the primary physics Story About Appearances is Quantum Theory which describes without error the complete range of Quantum Facts. A particular class of quantum facts concerns the EPR experiment (named after Einstein, Podolski and Rosen) in which two quantum particles A and B which were once together fly apart and are measured at two distant locations A and B.
In the Quantum Theory, observer A's choice of
of measurement to make on particle A instantly changes the state
of particle B--a general feature of quantum theory called "quantum
entanglement". In the theory a particle is represented by possibility
and relative phases. When the particles separate, so do the amplitudes,
but the phases of particle A remain entangled with the phases of
B. Any action on A--such as an observation--changes not only A's phases
but the phases of B as well.
But this non-local connection only exists in (the admittedly powerful) Theory. In Appearance (the quantum facts) no action taken by observer A ever leads to an observable effect (faster-than-light or otherwise) at location B. Thus the quantum facts do not show an FTL (voodoo) connection. In line with the apparent unobservability of instant links Quantum Theory itself despite its internal representation of non-local links never allows these links to surface as observable phenomena.
The Theory shows an instant connection twixt A and B; the Appearances do not. What about Reality? Can we tell a story about invisible influences behind the phenomena that leaves out the instant connection or must a non-local connection be necessarily present in every Quantum Reality--every story we can tell about the underlying causes of all possible experiments on separated particles A and B?
Irish physicist John Stewart Bell considered the EPR system and showed with a devilishly clever proof that all conceivable models of Reality must incorporate this instant connection. What Bell showed is that despite the fact that Relativity prohibits instantaneous connections, despite the fact that no such connections have ever been observed either in EPR experiments or any other, despite the fact that quantum theory itself predicts no observable instant connections, despite all these considerations from Fact and Theory, the Reality of the EPR particles is such that their initial contact must create an instantaneous voodoo-style link between them below the level of Appearances.
Bell's Theorem (Reality must be non-local) is remarkable for several reasons: 1) it is a mathematical proof, not a conjecture or speculation; 2) it is a proof about Reality not Appearances. How often does one find such a window into the nature of reality? 3) it is counter-intuitive: why should everywhere local facts need to be supported by a non-local reality?
For more technical information about Bell's Proof, See "Quantum Reality". For a good account of Bell's life and deeper quantum issues see Jeremy Bernstein's excellent account composed from interviews with Bell shortly before his death. Nick Herbert devised the world's shortest proof of Bell's theorem (Nick's Proof: versions One and Two) . Goldberger, Horne and Zeilinger (GHZ) generalized the two-particle EPR experiment to three or more particles and came up with what is probably the most elegant proof (using only eigenstates: quantum theory's deterministic subset) of nature's necessary non-locality.