with Tom Bearden appeared in a magazine
"Megabrain Report". It is dated 4-Feb-1991. The interviewers were Terry
Patten and Michael Hutchison.
you offer the layman an extremely simplified summary of what scalars
how they relate to Maxwell's equations, unified field theory, and the
of currently accepted quantum physics, relativity theory, and
for a complete explanation of how to unify the three major disciplines
of physics, specify what's wrong with the three present versions of
disciplines that has prevented their unification, and how this was in
original quaternion equations (some 200 of which are actually his
not the pale four vector equations written by Heaviside and Gibbs). You
also asked for an explanation of scalars versus vectors, and how the
vector analysis (of Heaviside and Gibbs) misses the boat with respect
structured scalars. And you've asked me to do it simply, in layman's
To say that that's a tall order is the understatement of the decade!
have a go at
it anyway. We'll start with scalars and vectors.
in the universe as two sorts those that move (have motion) and those
don't. In physics we know already that this is in error; there isn't
in the universe, anywhere, that is motionless. At least it is moving
time, which is still a special kind of motion. Also, we know that
seems to be made up of much finer things, and these finer things are
in motion - often very violent motion. So what we observe as a
thing - sitting still spatially, so to speak - is made up of subthings
in violent motion spatially. And the whole system that is not moving
is still moving in time. However, we don't see "time" but just space;
we see the thing as "motionless." However, the "motionless" thing we
at is rather like a fixed whirlpool in a swiftly flowing river the
seems to us to stay "fixed" and motionless, but internally its parts
flowing water) are in constant motion.
example is a container
of gas under pressure - such as the air tank at the service station.
tank and "the air as a whole spatial volume" isn't going anywhere, and
we see them as "motionless." But inside the gas its molecules are in
motion, undergoing collisions, etc. Indeed, inside the walls of the
the molecules and atoms are in vibrational back-and-forth motion in a
The point is, physically
"motion" and "motionless" only apply to the external characteristics of
the object to which we pin the label. So it represents only
overall characteristic of the object, and does not completely describe
it. In a sense "motionless" is filled with motion, and all is motion.
analysis, a scalar
quantity is considered to be a quantity that has magnitude or size, but
no motion. An example is pressure; the pressure of a gas has a certain
value of so many pounds per square inch, and we can measure it, but the
notion of pressure does not involve the notion of movement of the gas
space. Therefore pressure is a scalar quantity, and it's a gross,
quantity since it's a scalar. Note, however, the dramatic difference
between the physics of the situation and mathematics of the situation.
In mathematics, when you say something is a scalar, you're just
of a number, without having a direction attached to it. And
that's all there is to it; the number doesn't have an internal
it doesn't have internal motion, etc. It just has magnitude - and, of
location, which may be attachment to an object.
we say something has pressure or a scalar value, that is not all there
is to it. That particular aspect of the object or system may be scalar,
but internally the thing it's labeling can still be decomposed into
or particles or small things in violent motion. That is, in physics the
scalar quantity can mathematically be further decomposed into an
of vector quantities. Since these parts are rushing around in all
but the whole is not translating through space, then obviously the sum
of all those fractional motions must be zero. Scalar pressure, for
can be decomposed into a myriad of opposing force vectors per unit area.
is an entity that not only may have magnitude or size, but is
through space. In physics, we apply the vector concept to something
is moving, and/or to position. However, when we think further, that
is made of smaller things, which also are in violent motion, and these
smaller things may be swarming all over the place with differing
- or even flowing at high speed in and out of the moving "system-
represented by the vector. So even here, the vector thing is a special
case of an ensemble of smaller things.
in anything - even inside a single point - there are always infolded
things in violent motion. We may say that these interior critters
"hyperspatial" or "infolded" or "virtual" or "hidden".
But they're real and they're inside the point, as seen by the external
The point is
seen externally is a plenum internally. In the real physical world,
a thing that's externally motionless (a scalar) and a thing (a vector)
that's externally translating through space, are special cases of a
whose internal parts are always in motion. If the sum of the internal
is zero, the external object seems to be sitting still and motionless
us (though it's still moving through time with - usually - uniform
We describe that internal characteristic of the system as a vector zero
resultant system. Externally we may also characterize it as a scalar,
it still possesses attributes that have magnitude. On the other hand,
the sum of the internal motions is not zero, but is a motion in a
spatial direction, then to us the external object seems to be moving
in space. That is, it is translating spatially. Externally it has both
magnitude and direction, so we view it as a vector. To label a thing as
only a vector is to look only at its external attributes. To label a
as only a scalar is to look only at its external attributes. To look at
its internal attributes, it must be recognized as a scalar and a vector
at the same time. That is, the scalar attributes must be recognized to
be composed on internal vectors.
that up, physically
a scalar thing is a thing that (1) is a vector in time, which is hidden
from direct observation, (2) externally is just a magnitude spatially,
and (3) has an internal spatial vector structure, and therefore a
or virtual-state vector structure. A vector is a thing in motion in a
(through a frame), whether in space, hyperspace, or time. Rigorously it
is not possible to exclusively separate the notions of vector and
because any scalar, to persist, is automatically a vector in time.
and scalar are normally not nearly so well clarified in standard
and mathematics texts, unfortunately. Usually discussions of this type
are reserved to obscure papers in foundations of mathematics. It may
the casual student, for example, that the notions of line, point,
zero, length, dimension, frame, time, and observer have no truly
definitions. Neither do the notions of force, mass, field, potential,
In fact, mathematics no longer attempts to explain how a line can be
of points. Instead, in foundations, it is simply stated as three
thusly "There is a class of entities called points. There is another
of entities called lines. Lines are composed of points."
From a physics
of the big problems with the present vector mathematics - which is
well-known not to be a complete system of mathematics in the first
- is that the presence of a bunch of vectors that sum to zero is
treated as a zero or absence of any vectors at all. That is, the
of any internal vectors at all is made synonymous to the presence of a
bunch of internal vectors that are fighting each other to a draw. What
this does is throw away the internal energy and internal ordered
of the medium - specifically, the energy of all the vector fighters
is continually going on inside the local medium - inside spacetime
Physically that's quite wrong, and one is throwing away exactly half
energy of the situation. There is a very real physical difference
a system of real vectors that fight to a draw and so do not translate
masse, and the absence of any vectors and vector-fighting at all. The
is composed of stress and its internal vector patterns - the internal
engines in local spacetime and local rest mass - in short, the energy
in the local medium.
meet this hidden problem, of course, is in the fact that the four
Heaviside equations of EM are not closed. One always has to assume that
one or more of the "remaining potentials" is zero - that is, absent. So
right there all the texts and professors reduce even Heaviside's
to a special case of the absence of any "left-over and hanging around"
scalar potentials. As an example, that little assumption gets rid of
possibility of theAharonov-Bohm effect,
where potentials alone can interfere, even in the absence of EM force
and produce real force effects in charged particle systems. That is,
sole agent of the interference of scalar potentials can induce EM
according to the experimentally proven Aharonov-Bohm effect, even in
total absence of EM force fields.
Since 1959, it
known in quantum mechanics that the EM force fields are not primary
agents at all. We know that classical EM theory is completely
on this.QM shows that it's the potentials that are primary, not the
force fields. In fact, it can be shown that the E-field
do not exist as such in vacuum; only the potential for the E-field and
the B-field exist in vacuum. Feynman pointed that out, but nearly all
his modern cohorts seem not to have recognized that fact. Indeed, vacuum
is just a conglomerate of potentials, nothing more, nothing less.
if you just look carefully at the definitions of force and E-field, you
see immediately that (1) force (nonrelativistic case) consists of mass
times acceleration. Therefore a force consists of an accelerated mass.
An electric force consists of an accelerated charged mass, normalized
a unit. But it really isn't treated that way in the EM theory, where it
continues to erroneously considered to exist as a force field in the
you've got to use
the adjectives "virtual" and "observable" to differentiate vacuum
from material things. One can correctly state that a virtual electric
field exists in vacuum, comprised of accelerating virtual masses, but
an observable force field. The observable electric force field
and consists of, accelerated observable charged particles. And the only
place observable particles exist are in a physical medium, of a
of one or more observable particles in space.
So it doesn't
take any special
powers of thought to directly show that there are some very serious,
things wrong with the present foundations of EM theory. There are lots
of other flaws in EM, such as the fall of the Lorentz force law in
railgun experiments. The law has always been false, but is a sufficient
approximation if the energy regime is not too high. Peter Graneau's
is fundamental in this respect.
To sum this up
another way. The
present vector analysis (as applied to electromagnetics) discards the
trapped EM energy of local spacetime. Now if the internal trapped
of spacetime varies from place to place, that is called a curved
relativistically speaking. And when a spacetime is curved, there is
of energy between the internal, infolded, virtual EM energy state and
external, translating, observable EM energy state. Curved one way, the
local spacetime is a sink, with external energy pouring into it
and disappearing from observation of the external state. Curved the
way, the local spacetime is a source, with energy pouring out of it
and appearing in observation in the external state.
system of EM does, therefore, is throw out the ability to use the very
strong EM force as an agent to curve local spacetime. The very
itself, a priori, assumes and guarantees a locally flat spacetime. And
in an uncurved region of spacetime, for example, you are never going to
make an over-unity machine - a so-called "free energy" machine that
give you more energy out than you put in - because the application of
vector theory a priori guarantees the elimination of any hidden sources
from the local spacetime (ST) medium. If you're going to tap the
vacuum energy, and make a so-called "free energy" device, you're going
to have to curve the local spacetime. That is the only way to produce a
local energy source in the vacuum, from which a current issues. Notice
that, when we put a paddlewheel in a river, we produce a free energy
because we tap some of the energy in the flow. But we tap a current, we
do not just tap a potential per se. The entire secret of tapping vacuum
energy, to build a free energy device, is to produce a current in the
vacuum potential that is self- sustained, and then tap that current.
So the present
throws away exactly half of the energetics of the situation involved.
From time to time yet another physicist discovers that astonishing
and publishes a paper on it to point it out. Nobody does anything about
it, however, because no one has the foggiest notion of what to do. So
just lets it pass and nothing is changed.
Can you give us a more concrete example of the missing half of the
for example, you connect a voltmeter across a wall circuit to measure
voltage. The meter needle moves against a spring with a force, as a
of the detection made by the voltmeter. The actual detection is an
inside the meter's probe which induces conduction electrons to move. We
read the needle movement that resulted from those conduction electrons,
and we infer so much voltage. The important point is this The voltmeter
is measuring the energetics of its own internal change; it is not at
measuring anything external. All instruments measure only their own
change. We infer the external thing that interacted with the instrument
to cause the internal change. We do not measure the external entity
but only the results of its interaction inside the probe and meter. And
even then, we measure only the external, spatial-translation energy of
the instrumental interaction; we do not measure or account for the
energy of that interaction. To state it more precisely The needle moved
because conduction electrons accelerated away from the instrument's
area. This current flowed into a coil and produced a force on the
movement, rotating the needle against a spring. At the same time,
current - a time-reversed, phase-conjugate current - was induced in the
atomic nuclei of the atoms in the interaction area. This "inner
flowed Whittaker- wise through the atomic nuclei of the instrument,
an equal and opposite force. [This is the mechanism that produces
third law in the first place, as suspected by Feynman.] So the entire
mass of the meter recoiled slightly from an equal and opposite force,
we just loosely refer to - and recognize as - Newton's reaction force.
It's there, it's real, but we completely neglect it in our electrical
Usually we don't think it had anything to do with the external entity
interacted with the voltmeter. But it was a product of the same
of that external "something" within the meter. It's equal and opposite
to what generated our electrical measurement. So exactly as much energy
was produced in the "reaction force" energetics as was produced in the
"external meter needle force" part of the interaction. We only measured
and accounted for half the true energy of the interaction, or else
got to discard Newton's third law.
that what actually
entered into the interaction was a system of oppositely paired forces -
a stress field, which is a scalar potential. This, of course,
consistent with our observation that vacuum itself is pure
such, it consists of partial potentials of various kinds - it's highly
charged, and the ambient vacuum scalar potential has very high
Remember that this ambient vacuum stress (potential) can be decomposed
into sets of bidirectional forces. In our EM interaction, one- half of
the stress pair - the half that is the normal photon-generated EM
utilized to move the conduction electrons, involving primarily the
shells of the atoms imbedded in the vacuum potential. The other half of
the stress-pair interacted with, and moved, the atomic nucleus, causing
it to recoil. The recoil of the nucleus was slight, because it is very,
very much heavier than the accelerated outer electron.
binary, it's not singular at all. When we detect photons or EM waves,
normally account for only the externalized translation part of the
of the interaction. We miss or neglect the internalized translation
and we miss or neglect precisely as much internal energy as we account
for externally. Again, I'm not the first one to point this out by any
Can you give us a precise summary statement of all this?
At the interaction
area, a part of the instrument and the external causal agent are
together as a compound system. In that area, the mass of the instrument
exists as atoms, each of which has an inner part (the nucleus) and an
part (the electron shells). In the coordinate system centered on that
system, conservation laws apply. The compressive stress of the
reacts internally - i.e., against the atoms with their inner and outer
parts. Reaction from the nucleus induces a tensile stress. This tensile
stress, in the simplest case, can be decomposed into equal and opposite
forces, since stress is merely a set of such equal and opposite forces.
One of the bidirectional interaction forces moves externally out of the
atom via the electrons, electromagnetically producing a conduction
current through the instrument and giving a needle reading. The second
bidirectional interaction force moves ever inward, since it is a phase
conjugate and reconcentrates inward ("crawfishes") rather than
outward. This forms a hidden Whittaker current through the atomic
producing a recoil on all of them. Precisely as much EM energy went
into the inner system as went into the outer system. But we normally
measure and account for the external energy, and ignore the energy in
Can you give us a reference related to this, for example?
you several of them that bear directly on this. See R. Chen,
of internal forces," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 49, No. 4, Apr.
1981, p. 372. Chen gives a discussion of these summation vectors and
vectors. He points out that the internal forces occur in equal and
pairs; in other words, as internal stresses. That's certainly pointing
out the internal, bidirectional force structure of a scalar stress - a
scalar potential, if we're talking EM stress and EM forces. Note that
internal pattern is exactly what Maxwell's quaternion theory captured
retained, and that the Heaviside and Gibbs vector theory discards.
the quaternions captured the internal order of this internal force
structure as well. Second, in a beautiful article Kidd bluntly states
all our measurement/detection is really binocular. See Richard Kidd
et al, "Evolution of the modern photon," American Journal of Physics,
57, No. 1, Jan. 1989, p. 27-35.
Whittaker, of course, wrote the definitive engineering
of how to do all this with EM waves - how to infold the EM waves into a
bidirectional wave structure that produces a standing wave of
force-field-free scalar potential. The two Whittaker papers are (1)
"On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics,"
Annalen, Vol. 57, 1903, p. 333-355; and (2) "On an expression of the
field due to electrons by means of two scalar potential functions,"
Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372.
Now these hidden
wave structures exist in all scalar potentials, whether they are
or not. For example, Ziolkowski has pointed out what is actually
1903 infolded bidirectional planar waves inside the acoustic scalar
in work on acoustic missiles. Acoustic missiles are slugs of very
sound energy that stay together in a slug as they travel, and strike a
target a terrible blow, just as if it were a "missile made of sound
[See Richard Ziolkowski, "Localized transmission of wave
Proc. SPIE Vol. 1061, Microwave and Particle Beam Sources and Directed
Energy Concepts, Jan. 1989, p. 396-397. Ed.] A Soviet scientist,
has pointed out the same remarkable bidirectional wave structure inside
the scalar potential associated with the Schroedinger wave equation
[See V.K. Ignatovich, "The remarkable capabilities of recursive
relations," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 1989, p.
873-878. Ed.] And I've pointed out a mechanism by means of which you
make a quantum potential, so that separate things - even widely
- can interact as if they were all pieces of the same system, and all
together at the same location. Further, I've pointed out that you can
structure that quantum potential with a Whittaker bidirectional wave
Can you make that last part a little simpler?
means is that in QM, there's a special kind of potential you can
that can connect spatially separated things and translate energy
them, in hidden fashion and essentially instantaneously. This
at a distance" directly results in action-at-a-distance.I've
advanced the mechanism for making one of these quantum potentials, so
is subject to laboratory test. Further, in that artificial quantum
you make, you can put in a hidden EM wave Whittaker structure - hidden
"pipes inside spacetime" itself, so to speak. Then you have established
hidden EM-wave-energy channels through spacetime, connecting widely
entities together. You can then put energy and specific energy patterns
- vacuum engines, if you will - directly through those hidden channels.
You can have the hidden energy emerge at a distant point and interact
and on a distant physical system there. This distantly-emerging
energy can be positive (disordering, or scattering) or negative
Transmitting scattering energy, you get distant heating - the
of heat energy at a distance. Transmitting reordering energy, you can
energy from the distant object or system through those hidden channels,
accomplishing distant electrostatic cooling.
thing to note
is that EM energy transmission through the hidden channel is not
to the speed of light. The speed of light refers to energy transmission
through 3-space, and the internal channel refers to energy
around 3-space, or in other words, through hyperspace. And it's
on the laboratory bench.
Are you saying that real energy can be transmitted faster than the
Not through 3-space, but "around" it.
means that it's
possible to produce energetic changes in a distant system at a distant
place, without transmitting energy "through space" in the normal sense.
transmit "around" space, so to speak, and directly in time or through
a higher dimension, depending on the model you're using to
this. Further, the speed of the internal EM energy transmission is not
limited to the speed of light. Whittaker already specifically pointed
out. Quantum mechanics also predicts instantaneous action-at-a-
and has essentially proven it experimentally. Finally, you can
Whittaker-engineer this "hyperspatial" transmission, if you will, to do
essentially whatever you wish to do in that distant system. It all
depends on how far you develop the technology; the basis is there.
you can eventually even develop a kind of teleportation. Whittaker
through the internal channel is already "teleportation" of energy, so
Does this have anything to do with Sheldrake's morphogenetic field?
morphogenetic field is pure-and- simply a species
potential, created amongst the members of a species. As experiences
are met by the individual members, they steadily input infolded EM
into the "inner" EM channels of that quantum potential. Since
infolded EM wave has its phase conjugate - or time-reversed replica -
and infolded automatically, a sort of "negative feedback" corrective EM
signal pattern for all inputs of the bad external EM stuff exists
the quantum potential. One can show that, for detrimental changes to
species' members, time reversal provides infolded signals that
an exact counter to the "overstress of the species," so to speak. These
"corrective antidotes" for the overstressed species, however, are in
virtual state. But as more of the same detrimental changes are
over generations, the countering signal structures residing in the
quantum potential will be increased over the same period of time.
the hidden EM structure - which is like jillions of little "vacuum
- is changing and internally structuring the Schroedinger potential for
Then one day
corrective charge is sufficient to breach the quantum threshold. One
also say that the spacetime potential occupied by the species members
now sufficiently curved and structured to serve as a specific-
energetic source for genetic change. Breaching this threshold causes
new genetic changes to occur in the entire species in a single jump. At
that point, the actual genetics of egg fertilization (conception) is
and shortly thereafter members of the species start being born with the
new change, specifically designed to counter or partially counter the
detrimental aspects in the species overstress. In a dramatic example,
how a reptilian species can "suddenly" develop light, air-filled bones;
feathers; and wings, for example, and change from a reptile to a bird
one single jump. Sheldrake's morphogenetic field is a species
potential and the charged-up Whittaker structure is the inducing agent.
You're saying, then, that living
use this inner, hidden EM energy channel in addition to the
energy channel that we know in ordinary external electromagnetics?
In fact, the distinction between a living system and a nonliving system
is precisely the fact that the living system deterministically
the inner EM energy channels inside Whittaker-structured scalar
potentials. And those scalar EM potentials are centered on the
nuclei of atoms
comprising the living system's molecules, cells, tissues, and mass.
How does that relate to present brain-wave research, and measurements
It says that
present research is devoted almost entirely to measuring and pondering
the surface waves in the ocean, so to speak. The mind, thoughts,
and real living functioning systems are deeply hidden, underwater waves
in that ocean. Science will have to instrument for detection and
of the hidden interior energetics region, or they will never solve the
mind/brain/body problem. And without the interior energetics,
will never understand life, memory, personality, thought, and primary
control, or human intent.
You are saying, then, that this hidden internal electromagnetic energy
channel is intimately connected with the mind, life, and
mind consists of stabilized Whittaker structures inside
living system's bio-potential. Thoughts are a
class of changes/waves in that overall Whittaker-structure ensemble.
unconscious is a single small, localized sample of yet a greater
that represents even deeper unconsciousness.
is a serial processor - one thing at a time. The unconscious
is totally conscious, but it is a parallel processor - jillions of
at one and the same time. The serial conscious mind can only make sense
of a "single slide in the slide projector" at a time. When it looks at
the unconscious mind, it sees a multitude of slides in the slide
simultaneously - hence it just sees blackness, or nothing recognizable
unconscious, for example, consists of archetypal infolded EM
acting in common in an overall bio-quantum-potential for the entire
Gaia, the living earth/biosphere, really does scientifically exist as a
common bio-quantum-potential with infolded living EM structures for the
entire earth biosphere. The bio-
in a single body is an overall quantum potential that links and
all the atoms and cells of the body. The "spirit" of the biosystem, if
you will, is its "living biopotential" - its living quantum
We already know that a potential is everywhere nonzero all the way out
to infinity. So the spirit of the living system is - in the virtual
- everywhere in the universe - and everywhen as well. It's
all a giant hologram, not only in space, but in spacetime.
universe is everywhere
alive, with everything. Note that if you simply examine the "ghost
requirement of quantum mechanics, this conclusion is inescapable. All
is eternal. Nothing is ever lost.
A thought or
is just a specific, dynamic Whittaker structure in the hidden EM
of the biopotential. Thoughts and thoughtforms are real. They
virtual spatially, but they occupy one "real" spacetime dimension,
Physics and metaphysics share one common, nonobservable dimension time.
So long as physics continues to have time, which is nonobservable a
then it also must contain everything that is a structure or action in
time. Skeptics of parapsychology, who
humans are robots and the mind is just a meat computer, just have
or no foundations knowledge. And if you get carried away by the
objective science" bit, remember that the choice of fundamental
units in physics is arbitrary. You can - and it's actually been done -
build all of physics from time as the single fundamental unit. That
that you can build the whole observable, detectable physics model
of the totally unobservable and nondetectable. Quantum mechanics
ago destroyed materialism for all time, but it just hasn't percolated
the prevailing scientific dogma yet.
you can conceivably "make" thoughtforms to order, and input them
into the mind and longterm memory. If we view the conscious mind as
a special serial computer, we have now found where the software is -
mind, longterm memory, and personality. As scalar EM technology
we will have direct access to the software, so to speak, for the
first time. And we will be able to engineer it at will.
But is this good or bad?
it's either, or both. We are describing a set of hidden internal EM
energy structures, the fundamental mechanism for internal EM
and a tool. A tool is amoral; it has no morality, and is inherently
good or bad. The intent of the user of the tool, however, may be either
good or bad. So the tool can always be used either way, for beneficial
purposes or for evil purposes. It's the hand that wields the knife that
is moral or immoral; it is not the knife. The same cutting tool can be
used by the surgeon to heal, or the murderer to kill. Human intent
amorality into morality and immorality.
What is the biological impact of the forthcoming new technology that
accesses and engineers the internal energy regime?
be both a tremendous blessing and a terrible curse. It's the
most powerful tool ever conceived. By engineering the
equation, for example, one can theoretically engineer physical change
One can actually engineer physical reality, change the laws of nature,
and determine if a thing shall even emerge into physical quantum change
at all, or if it shall change its physical form. Mind-wise, eventually
one will be able to directly input material into the mind - whatever is
desired. Education, for example, will simply be achieved by
the proper software." Everyone will be enormously educated, by today's
standards. That should for the first time allow the complete
of unemployment due to lack of employable skills, for example. It
be possible to virtually eliminate unemployment and poverty. Any sort
disease whatsoever - physical or mental - will be rapidly curable,
and cheaply. It will be possible to reverse aging and rejuvenate the
It will be possible to regrow limbs and straighten misshapen spines -
directly remove the causes of mental diseases and cure them as well.
will be staggeringly increased, without "old age's debilitation." AIDS,
cancer, leukemia, and genetic diseases will be completely conquered.
potential for a true golden era is upon us, for all humanity.
On the other
hand, it will
also be possible to simply pull out a personality-structure from a
without his or her consent, and insert another. Or to alter a given
structure by just altering and re-recording the software. This
possibility, of course, will certainly be noticed by would-be
and dictators, for it can yield the ultimate
mind control. It will also be possible to provide direct input
the mind, surreptitiously, from a distance and without the
and consent of the individual affected. This can be beneficial if
just "instantaneous telepathy" - instantaneous communications, so to
and if it's desired by the recipient. It can be highly detrimental if
is undesirable material, or if it's a forced internal change, or
or used to overwhelm and destroy the mind, or used to jam the body's
system, induce virulent diseases en masse, etc. Unless the present
of one human for another is overcome, future wars are likely to take on
aspects that stagger the imagination. In 1975 Brezhnev called these
new mass destruction weapons of the future "...more frightful than the
mind of man has ever imagined." He should know. When he made the
the Soviets had already been inducing diseases in persons in
U.S. Embassy in Moscow for nearly 30 years.
Can you explain that part about direct, forced input to the mind, just
a bit more?
Yes. It involves
a characteristic of the mind and brain that has been experimentally
For example, if anything (thought, feeling, emotion, image) arises
in one of the cerebral hemispheres, that hemispheric personality thinks
that it did it. That is, it thinks that it not only thought the
but that it also created the thought. So if you have a hidden channel
pipe in inputs, you can take over or implant the thoughts, behavior,
actions of a person. Or of a very large group of persons. That alone
a mind-numbing direct control of behavior externally and from a
Can you really control behavior electromagnetically? Can you give us an
can control it readily and deeply, if you develop and utilize the
EM energy channel technology. As to proof, Delgado certainly
demonstrated profound control over animal behavior experimentally, for
all the world to see, using implanted probes and precise injection of
signals. The Soviet LIDA machine, using a 40 MHz carrier and complex
- and actually the hidden Whittaker-infolded EM structuring, unknown to
Western technologists - has demonstrated the ability to place a mammal
- either a human or a cat - in a cataleptic state. That state can be
in a few minutes exposure and then persists for some minutes after the
stimulus signal is removed. That proves that you can profoundly alter
mental state, electromagnetically.
very best example
is provided by the two cerebral hemispheres in your own head, or those
in a rat, or those in a cockroach. As we know from split-brain
each hemisphere has a separate personality. That's a separate being, if
you will, to put it bluntly. Yet even though you are two beings in one
body, so to speak, you are only conscious of one being. How is that,
might ask, since both brain halves are operating? How do you integrate
two beings consciously into one functioning being? Such as is already
in your own head?
The answer is
your left brain sends a signal to your right thumb to move. While the
is on the way to the right thumb, the left brain also sends a replica
the signal over the connecting corpus callosum, into the right brain
where it emerges inside. [When the signal emerges inside a brain
it thinks that it itself originated it. That's because it perceives no
time delay between appearance of the signal in its "transmission"
e.g., and the appearance of the signal in its "receiver" section.] The
ultimate definition of identity, after all, is the absence of all
The absence of functional distinction in time constitutes the creation
of identity in time. The whole arises when and only when distinction
the parts is lost.]
thumb is continually
communicating back to the left brain half, telling its progress.
of those return signals from the thumb are continually being sent by
left brain across the corpus callosum into the right brain. The right
thinks that it originated the thumb- move-order, and that the right
is reporting its progress. The right brain thinks it did the whole
itself. A similar process occurs, of course, from left brain to right
Each inputs to the other, at least insofar as awareness of the order
the event is concerned. Each thinks that it did it. In that way, there
is a loss of distinction between the parts of the functionality.
there is only one sense of being in the bi-system, even though there
two separate beings.
It has also
been shown that,
when the corpus callosum is severed, the two brain halves now function
much more independently. In that case, two separate personalities
do emerge and function in one body. That also has been shown in the
But aren't you actually saying that the mind and thought, then,
are not really just electrical wiggles in the brain after all? That
actually separate from the physical brain, and the brain is just a
special sort of tuner or "workstation"?
real functioning of mind, thought, memory, and personality occurs in
infolded Whittaker bidirectional EM wave structures of the overall body's
scalar potential - its bio-potential. And one of the great neural
has already pointed out that mind and memory are not precise functions
of physical location in the brain.
Is there any real proof of the internal energy channel
of the mind, or is it just all still a theory or hypothesis?
can be shown, and it is directly subject to laboratory test, with a
laboratory and a little effort. Let me give you a very strong datum
There exists a
bafflingly medical phenomenon - which has until recently been concealed
- called hydrancephaly. To the normal materialistic Western
this condition is astonishing, to say the least. In hydrancephaly, a
cranial cavity is filled almost totally with fluid, not with brain
There may be only 5% or so of the brain in there; typically just the
portion on the tip of the spine. The other 95% of the brain case is
with fluid. Yet the individual may be as normal as you or I. Except, of
course, that x-rays of his head will astonish all the doctors. A few
ago, for example, such a hydrancephalic individual graduated from a
in Great Britain, with a degree in mathematics. British news actually
a video documentary on this subject, and particularly on that
Now obviously hydrancephaly
proves rather conclusively that it isn't really the brain matter or the
electrical wiggles in the two hemispheres that constitute the mind.Those
wiggles normally are correlated with, and communicate back and forth
the internal Whittaker dynamics of the bio- potential. The brain is a
communications and processing station, interfacing sensors and
stuff from the external world to the Whittaker-sets, and outputs from
Whittaker-sets to the body and cells. If just a small functioning part
of this "way station" remains fully functional, the interfacing still
Can you shed any light on the functioning of the fluid that fills 95%
the brain cavity of a hydrancephalic?
a little bit. There's an interesting thing about fluid - about water. The
hydrogen bonding structure of water is enormously complex and richly
Bond- structuring of water constitutes a special kind of "neo-
substructure inside a special kind of potential for that particular
of water. A glass of water, for example, has an overall
comprised of its hydrogen bond structuring. That water will change its
internal bonding structure if you enter the room, or if you blink your
eye while observing it. It continually adjusts to everything in its
The reason is, everything in its environment has charges, and clumps or
orderings or structures of potential. And the internal Whittaker
of all those potentials overlap because the potentials overlap.
the internal bidirectional Whittaker EM waves intercommute. The
dynamics of the water receives inputs from the surroundings this way,
the water's bonding structure changes accordingly. We've only
the complexity and richness of this water structuring for less than two
decades, and so far as I know, no one else seems to be considering the
Whittaker infolded EM wave structure aspects of it.
The point is
the fluid inside the head of a functional hydrancephalic, the water
structuring is quite sufficient to provide the rest of the needed
two-way tuner, processor, and transmitter-receiver." The reason
is quite simple The potential of the fluid constitutes a partial
in the overall bio-potential of the body. It's like the pressure of a
of gases the overall pressure consists of the partial pressures of the
component gases. The Whittaker structures ensure intermingling and
through the internal energy channels of the total bio-potential to all
its constituents. Therefore the water structuring of the
in the head of the hydrancephalic serves - bridgewise - as a substitute
of course, is that quantum mechanics experiments have essentially
action- at-a-distance and quantum correlation. The quantum potential,
is something real and functional after all.
And even more
is provided by the nature of a linear material versus the nature of a
material. However, that would take a book, and is just too much to
cover in this interview. Suffice it to say that a strong argument can
made from the nonlinear characteristics and phenomena themselves, such
as production of time-reversed waves, amplification of time-reversed
negentropy (re-ordering of scattering energy), etc.
line is that
there's certainly enough evidence to substantially support these
and move them from the realm of idle speculation to the realm of
for further experimentation and development." The ultimate proof, of
will be when one demonstrates the actual production, recording, and
of a living mind. With the internal energy approach, that is
quite possible, and will eventually be lab-demonstrated.
How is this related to the neurons, synapses, and dendrite firings in
normal human brain?
"internal electrical structure" thing is true of the brain and its
firings, EM waves, and tiny but extremely numerous currents and fields.
Take an instantaneous snapshot of all the dendrite firings - billions
them - frozen for an instant. The actual pattern or structure
the internal state of the brain's bio-potential at that instant. Take
snapshot a moment later. The change of the internal structuring
the brain's internal structuring at a new moment. Interfering
the two snapshots provides a delta that represents the exact and total
change that occurred in the brain-state during that tiny interval
snapshot one and snapshot two. But since thought itself is a change in
internal brain-state, then the thought patterns during that interval
be contained in those changes. And of course a myriad of other brain
actions are in there as well. Commands to beat the heart, direct
of cells, etc. To detect the internal state precisely, one now needs to
decompose that delta pattern into its Whittaker-structure components
sort them all out.
How would one go about detecting the internal state, to get at the
has rather much got involved with
the standard chaos problem. You've got hidden order (the thoughts)
buried up in a lot of extraneous material. In other words, you're
at something statistical, and it's got several kinds of hidden order
in there in what to you appears to be a whole lot of noise. So you do
very similar to what we described in the snapshot analogy, but apply
detection at the same time. Actually, a first step in this direction
been beautifully done by Dr. Hunt. She divided the external
region into several frequency bands. (Actually, harmonic intervals are
best, per Whittaker theory.) She set up individual detectors for all
frequency channels simultaneously. Then she divided each of these
in two branches one branch straight through without a time delay, and
other delayed by a bit, say, 6 milliseconds or so. Then she mixed all
delay channels onto all the nondelay channels, and recorded the
And lo and behold, she got beautiful traces of hidden chaos in brain
activity. The traces exhibited the standard chaos attractors. Her
work is very strong evidence that the real activity of the mind
in hidden variables, in hidden channels inside the normal
electromagnetics" represented by normal brain wave measurements.
has shown that there is a hidden, deterministic, dynamic order "inside"
the normal statistical EM brain activity.
decades ago, a
Russian scientist, Lisitsyn, obliquely spoke of Russian
in this area. Lisitsyn stated that the Soviets had "broken the human
code." He further stated that some 23 channels were involved, reaching
all the way up to optical frequencies. However, only 11 of these
channels were independent. He also mentioned that the brain coding did
not number over 44 "digits".
interpret his remarks
as indicative of direct application of Whittaker theory. Lisitsyn of
did not give the details; that's highly classified in the Soviet Union,
as witnessed by the Petukov/Toth incident in Moscow. However, I
Lisitsyn as having obliquely referred to 11 independent Whittaker
- the fundamental frequency and 10 harmonics - that are used by the
workstation to intercommunicate between the mind and the external
functioning of the organism. I interpret the remark about 44 digits to
probably mean that there are some 44 different independent Whittaker
sets, where each spectrum consists of the fundamental and 10 harmonics.
And in each frequency channel of a set, there are two bidirectional EM
waves - actually, an EM wave and its time-reversed antiwave (phase
Can you tell us something more about detection of standing scalar
detection of the scalar wave, you must realize that several kinds of
can be utilized. One kind is a spatially-oriented detector, and detects
spatial aspects and changes of the scalar wave and its internal
The other kind detects variations in the local rate of flow of time,
then the "finer time wave structure" of that variation. With either
the problem has two parts. Let's look first at the spatially- oriented
must detect the
absolute potential at the point of intersection. Second, in this
potential, one must detect its internal, infolded EM bidirectional wave
structure - in short, its Whittaker structure. An additional
of course, is that the instrument must be shielded against the effects
of spurious EM signals in the area. In short, it must be in a Faraday
Even more than that, one must be able to vary the grounding potential
the shielding cage. One must be able to let it float, have it at
or move it to some specific value.
A Geiger tube,
will usually detect a strong absolute potential. That is, the potential
increases the charge on the atoms or molecules of the gas it contains,
and at the ionization point, the gas starts to ionize. The counter, of
course, then counts the ion discharges, whose rate is correlated to the
level of ionization, and hence to the strength of the ionizing agent.
that Geiger tubes do not necessarily detect nuclear radiation; they
ionizing radiation, regardless of the type. While nuclear radiation is
certainly ionizing radiation, so is strong scalar radiation. Even
the scalar wave is a standing wave, its increased level of potential
ionize the gas in the tube. Of course, if the standing scalar potential
wave is a sine wave function of the radial distance from the source,
the Geiger counter is at the node, it will not read because there is no
difference there from normal ambient vacuum potential.
Note also that
"microwave radiation" of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow was detected
with a nuclear radiation detector - probably a Geiger counter. Pure
are non-ionizing, and would not have activated the counter. Shortly I
have a new book out, Gravitobiology A New Biophysics, which
explain precisely how the health changes in the Moscow radiation were
in U.S. Embassy personnel. In the book we will also explain
"death photons" and the EM induction of disease at a distance. We'll
explain the mechanism for producing an EM antidote signal for any
known or unknown.
with the Geiger
counter as detector is that it only accomplishes half the job, even
it works. It doesn't break out and measure the Whittaker bidirectional
EM wave structure of the ionizing potential at all.
Here is a
for a better detecting system. Use two detecting probes, some small
apart, inside the shield. At each probe point, use a high input
very low voltage detector - microvolts or picovolts range, normally.
signals should then be mixed and another difference frequency detector
of similar kind utilized. Under proper circumstances, this produces a
EM beat frequency (via the Aharonov-Bohm effect). The second stage of
detector can then come into play. The beat frequency is input into a
spectrum analyzer, which should detect the components of the Whittaker
spectrum as modulations on the detected Aharonov- Bohm effect beat
disadvantages of this
detector are two-fold. One, the actual ground potential at which the
is biased, affects whether or not you get a detection. Second, it's
a very short wavelength detector for, say, millimeter waves to waves in
the one meter band. That should be good enough for scalar
research, however, and the Soviets have reported highly significant
effects of the Lisitsyn kind at about 2.1 millimeter wavelengths.
one has to either have rather widely separated instruments operating in
a bistatic reception mode, for the scalar interferometry, or else use
materials and schemes in probes. Another way that can be worked out is
to use a characteristic of nonlinear materials. If a sine wave is input
to a nonlinear material, harmonics are produced. By tailoring and
the materials, one should get appreciable frequency shifting up the
via harmonic production.
Another way is
that a standing scalar potential wave can also be considered as a
wave in the rate of passage of time. So the presence of a scalar
alters the local rate of time passage. But since it alters time flow,
affects everything else that locally exists in time - and that's
More exactly, there is a stress effect on the rate of flow of time. And
there are certain detectable functions that occur in detectors and
state components, for example, that occur because of the time stream
changes. I cannot be more specific, because the effects I know about
were discovered by John Schnurer and are proprietary to him. But John
build a detector based on this effect, at least for the overall
It remains to develop detection of the EM substructure and its
and he will have a very good scalar EM system detector.
in developing detectors have been reported by Hunt, Bedini, Beck,
Golden, and others. Golden particularly has a very good scalar
detector, and several good scalar communications transmitters. One of
typical detector systems, for example, will perform between 20 and 30
better for a given power transmitted than will a normal communication
with high gain antennas. And, since the detection of scalar involves
the inner energy spectrum of the Whittaker structure, a direction
cannot get a direction fix on the signal transmitted via the scalar
an extremely sensitive coil of ultrafine wire, that can often
the finest superconductive quantum interference detector (SQUID). The
of extremely fine wire - and lots of overlaying coils - drastically
or blocks the radial movement of electrons in any one point in the wire
in the coil. Since that's the way electron current actually moves - the
movement down the wire is due to drift velocity, and certainly is not
signal - Beck's coil effectively prevents most of the "external
bleedoff" from the stabilized scalar potential. Thus he's able to block
most of the external electromagnetics, and thereby retain the inner
as well. Precisely, his coil is now using gravitons, not photons, to a
significant degree. So the coil as the interaction area of an
is able to hold and pass some of the internalized EM energy that
escapes into and through the nucleus only. At the output of the coil,
gets EM from this internal component that the SQUID doesn't see because
it doesn't do the escape-blocking in its interaction area.
schemes, of course, such as holographic interferometry, but this should
give you an idea of some of the things that have to be done to perform
good laboratory measurement of scalar electromagnetics.
Could you return to your discussion of what's wrong with
electromagnetics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity? Perhaps
could address them in order.
already stated the case for electromagnetics. Half of it - the really
part, the internal energetics - was discarded by Heaviside and Gibbs.
discarding the scalar component of the quaternion, they threw out the
EM energy of local spacetime and its communication with distant spatial
points. Since the localized energy density of spacetime is essentially
synonymous with gravitational potential, they threw out the ability to
turn EM force field energy into gravitational potential energy. They
out the interaction and entanglement of EM and gravitation, and wrote
special subset of Maxwell's theory that is restricted to the case where
gravity and electromagnetics do not interact. As a subset, their work
perfectly okay. However, a priori you will never use their approach -
the applied technology that follows its principles - to produce
over-unity machines, tapping of vacuum energy sources, etc. You will
electrically change the inertia of a body at rest, structure the
and magnetic flux itself, or achieve and utilize action at a distance.
And your instruments developed in accord with the Heaviside/Gibbs EM
will never detect or measure the mind, thought, and emotion - for those
instruments a priori discard and ignore the internal energy arena where
mind, thought, and emotion reside and function. And since the
EM energy is scattering energy, energy once scattered will produce
- increased disorder, and only the positive flow of time. And that
and technology will never be able to translate EM energy into G- energy
and vice versa. Every system built under its principles will be at
best a "break-even" system. It will never produce more energy out than
is input in. It is at best a diode engineering technology.
What about present quantum mechanics?
mechanics has a severe foundations problem the missing chaos, or in
words, the problem of the missing hidden order. Let me explain how
that came about. When physicists were constructing quantum mechanics,
was of necessity a statistical theory. They simply lifted the Gibbs
statistics, and utilized it as the quantum statistics. Furthermore,
statistics was based on the theory of the random variable; that is, the
variables were considered random. So, because random variable
were utilized, the QM postulate that "quantum change is statistical"
over-restricted to the special case of "quantum change not only is
but also is random." The second case, "quantum change is statistical,
can contain hidden order and be nonrandom," was thus excluded a priori,
simply because of the statistics utilized. Now the random change
is easily falsified, as follows If you collect large numbers of random
change, the resulting collection is still random. The next collection
not necessarily produce the same collection at all. (In fact, if it
then this is prima facie evidence that the variables are not all
means is that,if
quantum change is random, then collections of these random tiny changes
could never integrate to provide us the ordered macroscopic universe we
live in and observe. You couldn't have a flower, or a tree, or
for that matter - just total randomness. Obviously that is not true, or
else you and I do not exist and this macroworld does not exist.
integration of the
statistical quantum changes to yield an ordered macroscopic universe,
change must contain hidden order. That is, the variables must be
not random. If the changes are chaotic, then integration of them will
large scale forms emerge and stabilize - which is what we actually
in physical reality.
foundations problem in quantum mechanics today is the problem of the
chaos! Try as they will, quantum physicists cannot find the missing
order, because they continue to use the Gibbs statistics that already
it. So they now know that somehow QM is wrong, and many of them fear
this most successful of physics theories will have to be completely
Bohm, of course, long ago pointed out that hidden variables
contain the hidden order. Actually all of experimental physics is
with his hidden variable theory (HVT). Mainline QM theoreticians,
shun hidden variables (and therefore hidden order). They avoid hidden
theory by applying a kind of Occam's razor They say that Bohm's HVT
predicts no new phenomena, so why adopt it at all, or even seriously
it? And since Bohm did not know how to actually engineer his hidden
nothing could be found experimentally with it that could not also be
by the present QM.
Now this is
work - and Maxwell's original quaternion theory of EM - saves the day
decisively decides the issue. Whittaker's hidden variable theory is
engineerable on the lab bench. It's testable, and when applied to
mechanics, it predicts hordes of new phenomena and effects, so it
gets by the old "Occam's razor" saw. When you apply Whittaker's
to QM, again you provide testable internal EM bidirectional wave
to the scalar potential, including the Schroedinger potential.
work allows direct engineering of quantum change itself, and
testable hidden order inside the "Gibbs statistics." In other words,
of the Whittaker work to QM produces a superset of QM, where the
chaos is restored.
change is statistical" now has three special cases, theoretically (1)
case where no internal order is present, and quantum change is random;
(2) the case where some internal order, but not total, is present, and
quantum change is already chaotic; and (3) the case where quantum
is perfectly engineered and hence perfectly ordered and deterministic.
by adding the
hidden order and the internalized EM energy, we've now extended both QM
and EM, and unified the two on a common subset each's Whittaker-applied
subset, which is the same subset shared by the two.
So how about general relativity? How does it fit in?
thing also happened to general relativity, believe it or not! Einstein
unwittingly restricted general relativity to a subset of the theory he
intended to write. This over-restriction was again an indirect result
the fundamental Heaviside/Gibbs error in electromagnetics.
view of electromagnetics approximated the classical view. In classical
EM theory, EM and gravitation were mutually exclusive. That is, the
EM force was not usable as an agent to curve spacetime.
agent, Einstein only considered the weak gravitational force due to the
attraction of mass. Now the G-force is far, far weaker than the
For two electrons, for example, the attractive G-force between them is
on the order of only 10exp-42 times as strong as the electrical
The G-force is very, very weak! If only the weak G-force is considered
for curving spacetime, then there will never be an observable spacetime
curvature, except in the immediate vicinity of a very large mass - such
as on the surface of the sun or a star.
reasoned that the
laboratory, and the observer/scientist and instrument, would never be
the surface of the sun or of a star. Therefore, he reasoned, the local
spacetime -- where the lab, the observer, and the instruments are --
never be curved. The local spacetime would always be flat.
then made a fundamental error. He overgeneralized his thought
He stated one of his fundamental postulates of general relativity as
local spacetime is always flat." This is overly restrictive, and did
follow from his thought process. His postulate can be more accurately
as follows "The local spacetime is always flat, whenever only the weak
gravitational force is used for the agent of curvature and the local
of interest is not near a large collection of mass."
the two statements of the postulate. Einstein's overstatement does not
allow the far stronger EM force to be used for curvature. In effect,
own overstatement excluded electromagnetics from curvature unity with
in his own general relativity theory. Ironically Einstein then tried
the rest of his life to fit electromagnetics back in there - never
that his own too-strenuous statement of the flat local spacetime
doomed all his efforts to failure.
On the other
hand, the corrected
statement of his postulate admits the following corollary "When a very
strong force such as the electromagnetic force is used for the agent of
curvature, the local spacetime may be curved, even though the local
of interest is not near a large collection of mass."
As can be
unwittingly wrote only a subset of his intended theory. Correct
of his overstated postulate of uncurved spacetime dramatically extends
general relativity, and unites it with electromagnetics in a unified
error also excluded
the present general relativity from ever being a laboratory
science. If no detectable spacetime curvature is available locally, it
obviously can't be measured in the lab. The vanishingly small local
waves following from mass- attraction gravitation are still predicted
be several orders of magnitude below the ability of the finest
detector. And that detector is a huge, monstrous, very costly thing. A
priori, if the observer's local spacetime is always flat, there is no
experiment or local apparatus that involves or yields a curved local
modern followers have raised Einsteinian general relativity to a dogma.
They ruthlessly uphold the overstatement of the flat local spacetime
Physicists who would dispute it - and quite a few would do so - are
barred from obtaining funding. If they persist with their heresy, their
scientific stature is lost, and they are ostracized and cut off
Simply read Santilli's book, if you wish a clear inside picture. Contrary
to the scientific propaganda, orthodox science is ruthless in defending
its doctrine against all would-be heretics. Much of science has
converted to a religion, instead of a science. Any person knowledgeable
of scientific history can cite numerous examples of scientific
character assassination, and essentially banishment. Gauss's nonlinear
geometry, Wegener's continental drift, Mayer's discovery of the
of energy, Ovshinsky's amorphous semiconductors, physical therapy, the
EKG, and the clinical use of hypnosis come readily to mind. Scientists
form a distribution, just like any other group. Some of them are
Some of them are devils. The broad majority is neither, but is made up
of just ordinary people like you and me, doing a specialized job. Every
scientific model is known to be falsifiable and imperfect in the first
place, if you believe Godel's theorem. Scientific method does not yield
total truth anyway, by its own assertion; at best it yields a partial
By the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, every measurement distorts the
entity with which the instrument interacts, changing what actually
to be measured. Real scientists know that scientific models are
For any model, sooner or later a better one, an improvement, will be
At any rate,
when one looks
at Maxwell's quaternion theory, the scalar component captured the
to enfold and utilize the strong electromagnetic force to make a
potential filled with a structure of dynamic EM vector energy. However,
if the translation components of the quaternion were zeroed, the system
of trapped spatiotemporal energy did not translate spatially, but only
temporally. That, of course, is a scalar EM potential without an
force-field gradient. Since it is really trapped energy that
attracts other trapped energy, then all potentials are gravitational -
as is well-known.
In fact, in
pointed out that gravitational field is not actually a primary field of
nature. Instead, it's always a conglomerate produced from other fields.
If his hypothesis is true, then to the first order gravity should be
of electromagnetics, since it's the strongest force we normally will be
able to meet or utilize.
Whittaker's profound two papers directly show that. They also show how
to engineer all this on the laboratory bench. So the Whittaker scalar
approach is testable, which meets the major criterion for the
between a hypothesis and a theory. Any decent university physics and/or
electromagnetics staff who put their minds to it can test the approach.
Are there other physicists or scientists to whom we should also give
for these things?
like to mention that Nikola Tesla
experimentally discovered the standing scalar EM potential wave on the
night of July 3-4, 1899, in his Colorado Springs laboratory. He found
being radiated from a traveling thunderstorm. He recognized it as an
sound wave". This was four years before, unknown to the world,
wrote and published the precise theory for that same
wave. Tesla always stated that, in the remarkable systems he later
to, he was not using Hertzian waves. Rather, he pointed out, he was
EM sound waves - which must be modeled longitudinally. Today we know
was correct - and all his detractors were wrong.
I'd also like
to point out
the patents and work of Hooper. Hooper seems to be the only
who ever methodically investigated EM stresses, structuring of those
and the gravitational implications of those stresses in the laboratory.
I'd like to
also point out Sakharov,
and honor him for his clear statement that gravitation is not primary,
but is a conglomerated field made from other fields. One should also
out the explosive progress made in stochastic electrodynamics as a
of Sakharov's suggestion, by Hal Puthoff and others. And one should
honor scientists such as Peter Graneau, who have struggled to
out the foundations problems of electromagnetics and experimentally
up their findings.
I'd like to
mention that I've been privileged to work with some extraordinary
In deference to their requests, I will not give a straightforward list
of them at this time. But a great deal of any insight I may have gained
is in large part due to painstaking, maddening, persistent experiments
they have done in the thousands. We will have more to say - and
- about their actual contributions at a later date, hopefully later
year. Lots of other brilliant inventors - Moray and Sweet
come readily to mind - have also struggled in this field and produced
and unrewarded results.
Can you spell out again what effect excluding the internal EM
had on physics, as simply as possible, and how that is related to
that casting out the internal order and internal structure of the local
ST does, is to remove any consideration of hidden, deterministic
that could be manipulated to create and control quantum change itself.
As can be
seen, then, in
the physical world scalar quantities are very often really zero vector
systems, where the "scalar" or motionless system is actually filled
hosts of smaller "vector" things in violent motion. We have to be very
careful, therefore, when we apply mathematics (which does not decompose
fundamental scalars into vectors, or identify them as vector zeros) to
a physical situation. To use an extreme example, two elephants pushing
strongly head-on against each other may produce a "two-elephant" system
of opposing forces (vectors), where the system is stationary. The
is thus a zero resultant vector system, whose motion is represented by
a vector zero. The same would be true for two fleas pushing against
other and not moving as a system; the system would be a zero resultant
vector system, whose motion is represented by a vector zero.
where the mathematics
betrays us, if accepted unQuestioningly. In vector analysis, all vector
zeros are identical. Here we are saying that the translatory motions of
the flea system and the elephant system are the same. That's true, but
there's a whale of a lot of difference in the two systems that must be
accounted for physically! If you don't believe that, put yourself in
the two pushing elephants, and see if that's the same as being between
the two pushing fleas! You'll certainly notice a lot more stress on you
from the elephants than from the fleas.
illustrates a fundamental
problem with vector analysis. In the concepts of the math itself,
conceives a "vector space" as a sort of "place where one can put
Further, no matter how many vectors we put in there, or how they
the vector space itself is never under any stress. In other words, in
space, elephant-pushing and flea-pushing are identically the same. And
that's the problem. When vector analysis is applied to physical
imbedded inside the mathematics of vector analysis itself is the
discarding of the stress of local space or spacetime, resulting from
interaction of vectors representing interacting motional physical
is not the case. Quaternions that interact capture this "local stress
spacetime" and "locally trapped energy of spacetime" in the scalar
inside it. When the motional parts of interacting quaternions produce a
motionless or translationless state for the interacting parts as a
the stress, energy, and exact geometric patterning of the interactants
that are now locally trapped in spacetime is gathered in and accounted
for. The motional aspect may go to zero, but the scalar aspect will
not only magnitude but internal motion and the exact dynamic structure
of that internal motion.
a beautiful hidden variable theory, analogous to Bohm's beautiful work.
They incorporate two channels the external energy channel (which is
for example, by classical Heaviside/Gibbs EM theory), and also a hidden
internal energy channel (which is not addressed by Heaviside/Gibbs).
also incorporate hyperspatial aspects, since they are an
to complex number theory. Notice that Heaviside had to stick back in
numbers, to get his spatial vectors to unite magnetism and electricity.
So he essentially added one extra dimension, typified by the first
the square root of minus one. Quaternions already had that in there,
a lot more that Heaviside threw out.
Would you sum up how general relativity, electromagnetics, and quantum
mechanics are unified by the Whittaker approach?
Whittaker's work to each of the three, a superset of it is produced.
new superset has two subsets the present discipline and the extension
internal EM energy and hidden variable theory. Since all three
are actually the same thing, then all three supersets superpose on the
common extension set. Each of the present three disciplines is revealed
to be a special case, which unfortunately omitted the unifying
set. It's like a topless cardboard box that you've cut the bottom out
outfolded the sides separately. To be joined, those separate sides need
the bottom of the box. Whittaker provides the bottom. And it's testable.
Are there any other fundamental things from all this that you'd like to
point out, that you haven't mentioned, that follow from the eventual
of this new physics?
Please notice that Whittaker's work and the characteristics of
scalar component of the quaternion allow the direct electromagnetic
engineering of the vacuum. In fact, they allow the actually
and variation of massless electric charge flux itself. Now, in the new
approach, one electron can be quite different from another, because its
electric charge flux can be varied and patterned. Not only can its
electrical charge be varied, but its charge can be dynamically
Now the charge of an electron or other fundamental particle can vary,
the charge flux of a single particle (or a group) can be spatially
- or activated.
for example, allows an immediate and testable explanation of the
by means of which homeopathy
works. Recall what I said about water
and hydrancephaly. A chemical compound has a deterministic infolded
EM Whittaker structure. If you make a solution of the compound, you
this hidden internal energy structure of the fluid. If you then get
rid of the physical carrier - the mass of the original compound - and
leave the inner energy structure for that compound, you have
homeopathy. Chemistry is totally due to charge and charge
distribution. In homeopathy
you're retaining the charge template in the potential, and that affects
charges in the treated body just like the actual medication. In fact
because you now do not have the "physical residue" to worry with, but
things directly. These new concepts are profound and controversial
changes to the present foundations assumptions of physics and biology.
In the new
can't just automatically apply random variable statistics. You have to
apply chaos. In structuring the vacuum's virtual photon exchange with
mass of a charged particle, we have moved to a completely new and much
more fundamental level of engineering. Now the massless virtual
charge flux can be activated with a particular dynamic structure - a
engine, if you will - to perform a special job. Or we can activate a
spacetime itself, curving it and internally structuring that curvature
to our will. That locally curved spacetime then becomes a continuing,
source of a specialized vacuum engine or engines. We can tailor the
vacuum so as to be able to violate any and all of the present
laws, not just two out of three as the present CPT theorem permits.
we can use the vacuum's incredibly powerful flux to produce localized
engines. We can reach directly into the atomic nuclei with magic,
accurately controlled fingers.
We can for the
begin to do actual tailoring and engineering of the nucleus
We can further directly collect and integrate virtual state energy
which in QM are called "ghost forms." Literally, eventually anything
at all can be materialized and brought into physical reality, or
so as to disappear from physical reality. And we shall be able to
and change the local laws of nature, since we can directly engineer and
control the Schroedinger equation, the quantum potentials, and the
local vacuum potential in all its partial potential parts.
ready or not,
God has now seen fit to hand to humankind the ability to engineer
own physical reality and its own destiny. We can make of the new
reality a heaven or a hell. Whichever we do, we will reap the benefits
or face the consequences. It would indeed be wonderful if, for the
time, we could develop this powerful new tool to save humankind rather
than destroy it.