Confusable names
of maritime locations
There are quite a few place names found in more than one of the various English-speaking nations and elsewhere and sometimes more than once within the same nation. These can confuse the unwary and lead to incorrect transcription of records.
The geography of
place names can become quite a game. Even ordinarily serious people have been
known to take elaborate pains to warn a colleague against confusing some minor
city with the other one of the same name with all those ancient monuments in
Diversions
aside, the potential for error is real and serious when dealing with less
obvious examples. I have found records wrongly attributed because of an
understandable assumption or easily made error. For example, those unfamiliar
with Australian geography may easily assume that Brisbane Water adjoins the
The distinction
between the different shipbuilding and coal-exporting Newcastles is critical;
likewise the two major shipbuilding Belfasts. Within the
For Gareth Butler’s experience of the problem in relation to early volumes of Lloyd’s Register, refer to “Place of build” at http://www.lr.org/services_overview/shipping_information/is034research_early_registers.htm
*********
The following
table makes available my current working list of place name cautions for
whatever aid it may be to others. The places named are only those I judge
capable of being confused with some other maritime place while studying
maritime history - there are many other name duplications that are not of
international maritime significance. For example,
Most references
are to cases of identical spelling occurring in more than one jurisdiction or
multiple occurrences in the same. A few draw attention to slight variations of
spelling that are all that distinguish two names. Generally rows should be read
across but there are a few cases in adjoining rows (
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
County Down |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
River |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
|
Bid(d)eford |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Brid(ge)port |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
Gloucestershire |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Devonport |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
port and county |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Ont.; N.B. |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
St Vincent W.I. |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
Northumberland |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
(New |
- |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
N.H.; |
- |
Hampshire |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Rothesay |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Soloman's |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
cf. |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
St Thomas/...de
Pierreville |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
Virgin Is. ( |
|
Stockton-on-Tees/Stockton |
- |
- |
S.-on-Tees, Co. Durham |
Stockton, NSW |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
|
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
- |
Colony/State |
Port V.
=Lyttelton |
- |
|
White Haven,
Whitehaven |
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
|
Yarmouth/Great
Yarmouth |
|
|
Norfolk &
I.O.W. |
- |
- |
- |
I.O.W.
Mass.
N.B.
N.H.
N.J.
NSW
Ont.
W.I.
The Port Victoria
name for Lyttelton probably applies only in 1850’s records. It was previously known
as Port Cooper. The borough of Lyttelton was constituted in 1868.
Port Fairy,
To return to main
Maritime menu click
here